WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Enforcement
Evaluating the enforcement of human rights
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on whether domestic enforcement is weaker than it looks, the cost of judicial review, delay at Strasbourg, the enforcement of its judgments, and the charge of judicial activism.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give the argument that domestic enforcement of human rights is weaker than it looks
Give the criticism that judicial review is too expensive to be a real remedy.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give the argument that domestic enforcement under the Human Rights Act 1998 has been effective.
Model answer
A Convention point can now be raised in any court, remedies come far more quickly and cheaply than a journey to Strasbourg, and public authorities plan their decisions around the rights from the outset.
- 2
Give the argument that domestic enforcement is weaker than it looks.
Model answer
The strongest response to incompatible primary legislation is a declaration that changes nothing, awards of damages are modest, and the victim test shuts out the organisations best placed to litigate.
- 3
Give the criticism that judicial review is too expensive to be a real remedy.
Model answer
The cost of bringing a claim and the risk of paying the other side's costs deter individuals, so review is used mainly by those with funding or an organisation behind them.
- 4
What answer is given to the criticism about the cost of judicial review?
Model answer
Costs capping in public interest cases, together with legal aid for certain categories of claim, is said to keep the remedy within reach in the cases that matter most.
- 5
Give the criticism that judicial review has expanded too far.
Model answer
Critics argue that claims are increasingly used to delay and re-fight political decisions properly taken by ministers who answer to Parliament for them.
- 6
How is the criticism that judicial review has expanded too far answered?
Model answer
The permission stage filters out unarguable claims, the court rules only on legality and not on the merits, and a government confident that it acted lawfully has nothing to fear.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.