WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person
Evaluating the law on homicide and non-fatal offences
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the language and sentencing structure of the 1861 Act, why reform has not been enacted, the mandatory life sentence, the 2006 proposals, and gross negligence manslaughter.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did the Law Commission recommend in place of the 1861 offences?
Why have reforms to non-fatal offences not been enacted?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give three criticisms of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
Model answer
Its language is Victorian and obscure, the maximum sentences are not proportionate to the harm each offence requires, and the fault terms are inconsistent across the ladder of offences.
- 2
Explain why the maximum sentences for sections 47 and 20 are criticised.
Model answer
Both carry five years although section 20 requires a wound or really serious harm while section 47 requires only harm that is more than trifling, so the ladder does not rise with the seriousness.
- 3
Why is the word maliciously criticised in the 1861 Act?
Model answer
In ordinary speech it suggests spite or ill will, but in law it means only intention or recklessness, so it has to be explained afresh to every jury.
- 4
What did the Law Commission recommend in place of the 1861 offences?
Model answer
A modern hierarchy of intentionally causing serious injury, recklessly causing serious injury, and intentionally or recklessly causing injury, expressed in plain language with proportionate maximum sentences.
- 5
Why have reforms to non-fatal offences not been enacted?
Model answer
A draft Bill was published in 1998 and further proposals followed in 2015, but the reform is technical and politically unrewarding, so it has never been given parliamentary time.
- 6
Give one argument for keeping the mandatory life sentence for murder.
Model answer
A fixed sentence marks the unique gravity of taking a life and prevents inconsistent sentencing in the most serious offence there is.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.