levo

Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person

Evaluating the law on homicide and non-fatal offences

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on the language and sentencing structure of the 1861 Act, why reform has not been enacted, the mandatory life sentence, the 2006 proposals, and gross negligence manslaughter.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Why is the word maliciously criticised in the 1861 Act?

Key term

What did the Law Commission recommend in place of the 1861 offences?

Numbers

Why have reforms to non-fatal offences not been enacted?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Give three criticisms of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.

    Model answer

    Its language is Victorian and obscure, the maximum sentences are not proportionate to the harm each offence requires, and the fault terms are inconsistent across the ladder of offences.

  2. 2

    Explain why the maximum sentences for sections 47 and 20 are criticised.

    Model answer

    Both carry five years although section 20 requires a wound or really serious harm while section 47 requires only harm that is more than trifling, so the ladder does not rise with the seriousness.

  3. 3

    Why is the word maliciously criticised in the 1861 Act?

    Model answer

    In ordinary speech it suggests spite or ill will, but in law it means only intention or recklessness, so it has to be explained afresh to every jury.

  4. 4

    What did the Law Commission recommend in place of the 1861 offences?

    Model answer

    A modern hierarchy of intentionally causing serious injury, recklessly causing serious injury, and intentionally or recklessly causing injury, expressed in plain language with proportionate maximum sentences.

  5. 5

    Why have reforms to non-fatal offences not been enacted?

    Model answer

    A draft Bill was published in 1998 and further proposals followed in 2015, but the reform is technical and politically unrewarding, so it has never been given parliamentary time.

  6. 6

    Give one argument for keeping the mandatory life sentence for murder.

    Model answer

    A fixed sentence marks the unique gravity of taking a life and prevents inconsistent sentencing in the most serious offence there is.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.