levo

Tort: Negligence

Duty of care and the neighbour principle

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Three elements a claimant must prove in negligence, facts of Donoghue v Stevenson and neighbour principle.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Which case established the modern law of negligence?

Key term

Why could Mrs Donoghue not sue in contract?

Key term

State the neighbour principle.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Name the three elements a claimant must prove in negligence.

    Model answer

    That the defendant owed a duty of care, that the duty was breached, and that the breach caused damage that is not too remote.

  2. 2

    Which case established the modern law of negligence?

    Model answer

    Donoghue v Stevenson (1932).

  3. 3

    What were the facts of Donoghue v Stevenson?

    Model answer

    The claimant drank ginger beer from an opaque bottle bought for her by a friend and alleged it contained a decomposed snail, making her ill.

  4. 4

    Why could Mrs Donoghue not sue in contract?

    Model answer

    She had not bought the drink herself, so she had no contract with the seller or the manufacturer.

  5. 5

    State the neighbour principle.

    Model answer

    A person must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions they can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure their neighbour.

  6. 6

    Who is a neighbour in Lord Atkin's sense?

    Model answer

    Anyone so closely and directly affected by the act that the defendant ought reasonably to have them in contemplation.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.