WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Formation
Privity of contract and the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Doctrine of privity of contract and principal criticism of the strict doctrine of privity.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How must a third party be identified if they are to enforce a term under the Act of 1999?
What restriction does section 2 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 place on the contracting parties?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the doctrine of privity of contract.
Model answer
Only the parties to a contract are bound by it, and only the parties to it may sue on it, so a person who is not a party acquires no rights and incurs no obligations under it at common law.
- 2
What did Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge (1915) decide about privity?
Model answer
It decided that the tyre manufacturer could not enforce a minimum resale price against a retailer with whom it had no contract, because only a party who has given consideration under the agreement can sue on it.
- 3
What did Tweddle v Atkinson (1861) decide?
Model answer
It decided that a bridegroom could not enforce an agreement between his father and his father in law to pay him a sum on his marriage, because he was a stranger to that agreement and gave no consideration for it.
- 4
How did the widow succeed in Beswick v Beswick (1968) despite the privity rule?
Model answer
She could not sue in her personal capacity because she was not a party, but as administratrix of her husband's estate she stood in his shoes and obtained specific performance of the promise to pay her the annuity.
- 5
State the principal criticism of the strict doctrine of privity.
Model answer
It defeats the intention of the contracting parties, since a promise deliberately made for the benefit of a named third party could not be enforced by the only person who suffered from its breach.
- 6
How does a collateral contract avoid the privity rule?
Model answer
A separate contract is found between the promisor and the third party, supported by that party's own consideration, as in Shanklin Pier v Detel Products (1951) where a paint manufacturer's assurance about durability was enforceable by the pier owner who specified the paint.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Formation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.