WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Enforcement
Compatible interpretation and declarations of incompatibility
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on how far reading down can go after Ghaidan, its limits, the controversy over R v A (No 2), Bellinger, and who is entitled to be heard.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 direct a court to do?
Why is R v A (No 2) controversial?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 direct a court to do?
Model answer
To read and give effect to legislation compatibly with the Convention rights, so far as it is possible to do so.
- 2
Does section 3 apply to legislation passed before the Human Rights Act 1998?
Model answer
Yes, the obligation applies to primary and subordinate legislation whenever it was enacted.
- 3
What did Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004) decide?
Model answer
Words describing a person living with a tenant as their husband or wife were read as covering a surviving same-sex partner, so that the statutory succession right would not discriminate contrary to Articles 8 and 14.
- 4
What limit on section 3 did Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza identify?
Model answer
A court may depart from the unambiguous meaning of the words, but must not adopt a reading that goes against a fundamental feature of the legislation.
- 5
What did R v A (No 2) (2001) decide?
Model answer
The House of Lords used section 3 to read into a statutory restriction on evidence of a complainant's previous sexual behaviour a requirement that evidence necessary for a fair trial should be admitted.
- 6
Why is R v A (No 2) controversial?
Model answer
Critics say the reading effectively reversed a restriction Parliament had just enacted, so the court legislated under cover of interpretation.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.