levo

Human Rights: Enforcement

Compatible interpretation and declarations of incompatibility

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on how far reading down can go after Ghaidan, its limits, the controversy over R v A (No 2), Bellinger, and who is entitled to be heard.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Why does the choice between section 3 and section 4 matter constitutionally?

Key term

What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 direct a court to do?

Key term

Why is R v A (No 2) controversial?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 direct a court to do?

    Model answer

    To read and give effect to legislation compatibly with the Convention rights, so far as it is possible to do so.

  2. 2

    Does section 3 apply to legislation passed before the Human Rights Act 1998?

    Model answer

    Yes, the obligation applies to primary and subordinate legislation whenever it was enacted.

  3. 3

    What did Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004) decide?

    Model answer

    Words describing a person living with a tenant as their husband or wife were read as covering a surviving same-sex partner, so that the statutory succession right would not discriminate contrary to Articles 8 and 14.

  4. 4

    What limit on section 3 did Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza identify?

    Model answer

    A court may depart from the unambiguous meaning of the words, but must not adopt a reading that goes against a fundamental feature of the legislation.

  5. 5

    What did R v A (No 2) (2001) decide?

    Model answer

    The House of Lords used section 3 to read into a statutory restriction on evidence of a complainant's previous sexual behaviour a requirement that evidence necessary for a fair trial should be admitted.

  6. 6

    Why is R v A (No 2) controversial?

    Model answer

    Critics say the reading effectively reversed a restriction Parliament had just enacted, so the court legislated under cover of interpretation.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.