WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Statutory Interpretation
The mischief rule
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 1
Overview
Recall questions on the four matters a court must consider, Smith v Hughes, why Royal College of Nursing v DHSS was controversial, preambles, and the 1969 Law Commission recommendation.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case laid down the mischief rule?
What four matters does Heydon's Case direct the court to consider?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the mischief rule.
Model answer
The court identifies the defect in the previous law that the statute was passed to cure, and reads the statute so as to suppress that mischief and advance the remedy.
- 2
Which case laid down the mischief rule?
Model answer
The rule was laid down in Heydon's Case (1584).
- 3
What four matters does Heydon's Case direct the court to consider?
Model answer
What the common law was before the Act, what mischief that law failed to provide for, what remedy Parliament resolved upon, and the true reason for that remedy.
- 4
What was decided in Smith v Hughes (1960)?
Model answer
Women soliciting from balconies and windows were held to be soliciting in a street, because the mischief the Act addressed was the harassment of people walking in the street, and that is exactly what they were doing.
- 5
What was decided in Corkery v Carpenter (1951)?
Model answer
A bicycle was held to be a carriage for the offence of being drunk in charge of one on the highway, because the mischief was drunken people in control of transport endangering others.
- 6
What was decided in Elliott v Grey (1960)?
Model answer
A car jacked up with its battery removed was still being used on the road for the purposes of the compulsory insurance requirement, because the mischief was the hazard an uninsured vehicle on the highway presents.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.