WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Remedies
Causation and remoteness of damage
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on an intervening act, the two limbs in Hadley v Baxendale, the lost profits in Victoria Laundry, The Achilleas, and when a party's knowledge is assessed.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How does an intervening act affect a claim for breach of contract?
State the two limbs of the remoteness rule in Hadley v Baxendale (1854).
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What must a claimant prove about causation in a contract claim?
Model answer
The claimant must show that the breach was the effective or dominant cause of the loss, not merely an event without which the loss would not have occurred.
- 2
Why did the claim fail on causation in Quinn v Burch Bros (Builders) (1966)?
Model answer
The contractors failed to supply a stepladder, but the plasterer's own decision to use an unfooted trestle was the effective cause of his injury, so the breach did not cause the loss.
- 3
How does an intervening act affect a claim for breach of contract?
Model answer
An unreasonable act by the claimant or a third party may break the chain of causation, so the defendant is not liable for loss flowing from that act rather than from the breach.
- 4
State the two limbs of the remoteness rule in Hadley v Baxendale (1854).
Model answer
The claimant may recover loss arising naturally from the breach according to the usual course of things, and loss which both parties could reasonably have contemplated at the time of contracting as the probable result of a breach.
- 5
Why did the mill owners recover nothing for lost profits in Hadley v Baxendale (1854)?
Model answer
The carriers were not told that the mill would stand idle without the broken crankshaft, and since a mill would usually have a spare the loss of profit did not arise naturally and was not within their contemplation.
- 6
What did Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries (1949) allow the laundry to recover?
Model answer
The laundry recovered the ordinary profits lost through the delayed delivery of the boiler, because the engineers knew it was needed for immediate use in the business.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Remedies, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.