WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Protection and Reform
The case against a United Kingdom Bill of Rights
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the cost and disruption of change, the difficulty of agreeing content, the obstacle devolution and Northern Ireland present, press reporting, and adding social and economic rights.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give the argument against a United Kingdom Bill of Rights from the cost and disruption of changing the law
What obstacle does devolution place in the way of a new Bill of Rights?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give the argument that the rights are protected already.
Model answer
The Convention rights have domestic effect, are enforceable in every court and are supported by two decades of case law, so a new instrument would largely restate what exists.
- 2
Why do critics say that a Bill of Rights is really an attempt to reduce protection?
Model answer
Critics say proposals have generally sought to weaken remedies and narrow the courts' role, and that the language of a domestic charter conceals a cut in what a claimant can obtain.
- 3
Give the argument from the cost and disruption of changing the law.
Model answer
Replacing the Act would produce years of litigation about the meaning of the new wording, at public expense, before anyone could tell whether protection had improved.
- 4
Give the argument that agreement on the content of a Bill is unattainable.
Model answer
The commission that examined the question could not agree on why a Bill was needed or what it should contain, which suggests any draft would satisfy nobody.
- 5
What obstacle does devolution place in the way of a new Bill of Rights?
Model answer
Convention compatibility is built into the competence of the Senedd, the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly, so a new instrument would need their agreement and could not simply be imposed.
- 6
Why is Northern Ireland a particular obstacle to replacing the Act?
Model answer
The Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement 1998 contains a commitment to incorporating the Convention with direct access to the courts, so any change engages an international agreement between two states.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Protection and Reform, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.