WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability
Strict liability
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the difference from absolute liability, the presumption of mens rea and the Gammon factors, Sweet v Parsley, Alphacell and Storkwain, and the arguments either way.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is an offence of strict liability?
Distinguish strict liability from absolute liability.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is an offence of strict liability?
Model answer
A strict liability offence requires no proof of mens rea as to at least one element of the actus reus, so a defendant can be convicted without fault as to that element.
- 2
Distinguish strict liability from absolute liability.
Model answer
A strict liability offence still requires a voluntary actus reus but no guilty mind, while an absolute liability offence dispenses with voluntariness as well, as in a state of affairs offence.
- 3
What presumption is Parliament taken to make about mens rea?
Model answer
There is a presumption that mens rea is required in every offence, and clear words or a necessary implication are needed to displace it.
- 4
Which case sets out the approach to deciding whether an offence imposes strict liability?
Model answer
Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong (1985) confirmed the presumption of mens rea and set out when it may be displaced.
- 5
Name the factors identified in Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong (1985).
Model answer
The presumption of mens rea applies but may be displaced where the offence is regulatory rather than truly criminal, where the statute deals with an issue of social concern such as public safety, and where strict liability would promote enforcement.
- 6
Why is the truly criminal character of an offence relevant?
Model answer
The more serious the offence and the greater the stigma of conviction, the stronger the presumption that Parliament intended proof of a guilty mind, as Sweet v Parsley (1970) shows.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.