levo

Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability

Strict liability

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on the difference from absolute liability, the presumption of mens rea and the Gammon factors, Sweet v Parsley, Alphacell and Storkwain, and the arguments either way.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Why is the truly criminal character of an offence relevant to whether it is one of strict liability?

Key term

What is an offence of strict liability?

Key term

Distinguish strict liability from absolute liability.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is an offence of strict liability?

    Model answer

    A strict liability offence requires no proof of mens rea as to at least one element of the actus reus, so a defendant can be convicted without fault as to that element.

  2. 2

    Distinguish strict liability from absolute liability.

    Model answer

    A strict liability offence still requires a voluntary actus reus but no guilty mind, while an absolute liability offence dispenses with voluntariness as well, as in a state of affairs offence.

  3. 3

    What presumption is Parliament taken to make about mens rea?

    Model answer

    There is a presumption that mens rea is required in every offence, and clear words or a necessary implication are needed to displace it.

  4. 4

    Which case sets out the approach to deciding whether an offence imposes strict liability?

    Model answer

    Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong (1985) confirmed the presumption of mens rea and set out when it may be displaced.

  5. 5

    Name the factors identified in Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong (1985).

    Model answer

    The presumption of mens rea applies but may be displaced where the offence is regulatory rather than truly criminal, where the statute deals with an issue of social concern such as public safety, and where strict liability would promote enforcement.

  6. 6

    Why is the truly criminal character of an offence relevant?

    Model answer

    The more serious the offence and the greater the stigma of conviction, the stronger the presumption that Parliament intended proof of a guilty mind, as Sweet v Parsley (1970) shows.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.