levo

Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress

Economic duress

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Duress in the law of contract, economic duress and effect of duress on the contract.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What did the Supreme Court decide in Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) (2021)?

Key term

What did The Atlantic Baron (1979) decide about a demand for extra payment during shipbuilding?

Key term

Why did the carrier's demand amount to economic duress in Atlas Express v Kafco (1989)?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is duress in the law of contract?

    Model answer

    Duress is illegitimate pressure applied to force a party into a contract or a variation of one, so that the party's apparent agreement was not truly voluntary.

  2. 2

    Define economic duress.

    Model answer

    Economic duress is illegitimate commercial or financial pressure that leaves the other party with no realistic practical alternative but to agree, so their consent to the contract or variation is vitiated.

  3. 3

    State the three requirements a party must establish to prove economic duress.

    Model answer

    There must be pressure that the law regards as illegitimate, it must have been a significant cause of that party entering the agreement, and the party must have had no reasonable practical alternative to submitting to it.

  4. 4

    Which case first recognised economic duress in English law?

    Model answer

    The Siboen and The Sibotre (1976) first accepted that pressure other than a threat to the person or to goods could vitiate a contract, although the defence failed on the facts.

  5. 5

    What did The Atlantic Baron (1979) decide about a demand for extra payment during shipbuilding?

    Model answer

    The builders' threat to stop work unless the price was increased amounted to economic duress, but the owners lost the right to set the variation aside because they waited some months after delivery before protesting.

  6. 6

    What four factors did Pao On v Lau Yiu Long (1980) treat as evidence of duress?

    Model answer

    The court asks whether the party protested at the time, whether an alternative course such as a legal remedy was open to them, whether they were independently advised, and whether they took steps to avoid the agreement afterwards.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.