levo

Criminal Law: Defences

Insanity and the M'Naghten Rules

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

M'Naghten test, defect of reason and not knowing that the act was wrong.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

State the M'Naghten test.

Key term

What is meant by a defect of reason?

Numbers

Why is epilepsy classified as insanity in law?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Where do the rules on insanity as a defence come from?

    Model answer

    They come from the answers the judges gave to the House of Lords in M'Naghten's Case (1843), after a man who killed the Prime Minister's secretary while deluded was acquitted.

  2. 2

    State the M'Naghten test.

    Model answer

    At the time of the act the defendant must have been labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act, or, if they did know it, not to know that it was wrong.

  3. 3

    What is meant by a defect of reason?

    Model answer

    The defendant's powers of reasoning must be impaired, so absent-mindedness or confusion in a person who retains the power to reason is not enough.

  4. 4

    What counts as a disease of the mind?

    Model answer

    It is a legal rather than a medical term, covering any internal condition affecting the faculties of reason, memory and understanding, whether or not the brain itself is diseased.

  5. 5

    How did R v Kemp (1957) widen the disease of the mind?

    Model answer

    Arteriosclerosis restricting the flow of blood to the brain was held to be a disease of the mind, because the cause of the impairment need not be a mental illness.

  6. 6

    Why is epilepsy classified as insanity in law?

    Model answer

    R v Sullivan (1984) held that a seizure is an internal cause impairing the mental faculties, so a defendant who injured a man during a fit fell within the M'Naghten Rules.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Defences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.