WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences
Applying the more than merely preparatory test to the cases
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on why Gullefer and Geddes fell short, what tipped Jones and Tosti over the line, confronting the intended victim, and the difficulty these cases cause the police.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What tipped R v Tosti (1997) over the line?
How would a court treat a defendant caught climbing through a window with tools?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Why was there no attempted theft in R v Gullefer (1990)?
Model answer
The defendant jumped onto a greyhound track hoping to have the race declared void and recover his stake, but he had not gone beyond preparation towards obtaining his money back.
- 2
What made the defendant's conduct in R v Jones (1990) more than merely preparatory?
Model answer
He got into the back of his victim's car and pointed a loaded shotgun at him, and although the safety catch was still on he had gone beyond preparation for murder.
- 3
Why did the attempted robbery charge fail in R v Campbell (1991)?
Model answer
The defendant was arrested outside a post office with an imitation firearm and a threatening note but had not entered, so his acts were still preparatory.
- 4
Why did the conduct in R v Geddes (1996) not amount to an attempt?
Model answer
A man found in the lavatory block of a school with a knife, rope and masking tape had made no contact with any pupil, so he had prepared but had not embarked on the offence.
- 5
What tipped R v Tosti (1997) over the line?
Model answer
The defendants hid oxyacetylene equipment near a barn and bent down to examine the padlock, which the court held was the first step in the commission of the burglary.
- 6
Why was the defendant in R v Boyle and Boyle (1985) guilty of attempted burglary?
Model answer
They were found standing by a door with its lock and hinge broken, which was an act beyond preparation towards entering as trespassers.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.