levo

Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences

Applying the more than merely preparatory test to the cases

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on why Gullefer and Geddes fell short, what tipped Jones and Tosti over the line, confronting the intended victim, and the difficulty these cases cause the police.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What practical difficulty does the more than merely preparatory test create for the police?

Key term

What tipped R v Tosti (1997) over the line?

Key term

How would a court treat a defendant caught climbing through a window with tools?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Why was there no attempted theft in R v Gullefer (1990)?

    Model answer

    The defendant jumped onto a greyhound track hoping to have the race declared void and recover his stake, but he had not gone beyond preparation towards obtaining his money back.

  2. 2

    What made the defendant's conduct in R v Jones (1990) more than merely preparatory?

    Model answer

    He got into the back of his victim's car and pointed a loaded shotgun at him, and although the safety catch was still on he had gone beyond preparation for murder.

  3. 3

    Why did the attempted robbery charge fail in R v Campbell (1991)?

    Model answer

    The defendant was arrested outside a post office with an imitation firearm and a threatening note but had not entered, so his acts were still preparatory.

  4. 4

    Why did the conduct in R v Geddes (1996) not amount to an attempt?

    Model answer

    A man found in the lavatory block of a school with a knife, rope and masking tape had made no contact with any pupil, so he had prepared but had not embarked on the offence.

  5. 5

    What tipped R v Tosti (1997) over the line?

    Model answer

    The defendants hid oxyacetylene equipment near a barn and bent down to examine the padlock, which the court held was the first step in the commission of the burglary.

  6. 6

    Why was the defendant in R v Boyle and Boyle (1985) guilty of attempted burglary?

    Model answer

    They were found standing by a door with its lock and hinge broken, which was an act beyond preparation towards entering as trespassers.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.