WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Formation
Evaluating the rules of agreement and consideration
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Main criticism of the postal rule, case in favour of retaining the postal rule and case for retaining the requirement of consideration.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the case in favour of retaining the postal rule.
Explain the criticism that the doctrine of consideration defeats the parties' intentions.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Explain the criticism of the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat drawn in Fisher v Bell (1961).
Model answer
The decision defeated the evident purpose of the statute, since a shopkeeper displaying a weapon for sale escaped liability on a technical point of contract law, and Parliament had to amend the legislation to cover exposing goods for sale.
- 2
State the case in favour of keeping the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat.
Model answer
A trader would otherwise be bound to sell to everyone who responded, even after stock ran out or where a price had been misprinted, and would lose the ability to refuse a customer they have good reason to refuse.
- 3
State the main criticism of the postal rule.
Model answer
It can bind an offeror to a contract they never learn about, because a properly posted acceptance takes effect even if it is delayed or lost, which allocates the risk of the postal service to the party with no means of controlling it.
- 4
State the case in favour of retaining the postal rule.
Model answer
Some point must be fixed at which the parties can treat the bargain as closed, the offeror chose or accepted a method of communication out of both parties' control, and the rule can always be excluded by the terms of the offer.
- 5
How should an acceptance sent by email be treated, and why is the position uncertain?
Model answer
The better view is that an emailed acceptance takes effect on receipt in the same way as other near instantaneous communication, but there is no clear binding authority, so it is uncertain whether receipt means arrival on the server or the moment the recipient could reasonably read it.
- 6
Explain the criticism that the doctrine of consideration defeats the parties' intentions.
Model answer
A promise that is seriously meant, deliberately made and relied on will not be enforced unless something of value was given for it, so the law refuses to uphold agreements the parties plainly intended to be binding.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Formation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.