levo

Deontological Ethics

Finnis and proportionalism applied: immigration and capital punishment

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 3

Overview

Two theories brought to two hard cases, one refusing to weigh a basic good and the other insisting the weighing is the whole task.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Which of Finnis's basic goods bear most directly on immigration?

Key term

How would Finnis approach a claim to admission by a refugee?

Key term

Does Finnis's common good justify limits on immigration?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Which of Finnis's basic goods bear most directly on immigration?

    Model answer

    Life, friendship and the common good of the political community bear most directly. Knowledge and religion also count where a migrant's practice is at stake.

  2. 2

    How would Finnis approach a claim to admission by a refugee?

    Model answer

    A refugee's basic good of life is directly threatened, and no arbitrary preference among persons is permitted. The claim therefore weighs heavily against the receiving community's convenience.

  3. 3

    Does Finnis's common good justify limits on immigration?

    Model answer

    Authority exists to secure the conditions in which a community pursues the goods. Numbers that genuinely undermine those conditions can therefore be limited.

  4. 4

    How would a proportionalist approach immigration control?

    Model answer

    Restricting movement causes an ontic evil of separation and hardship. Restriction is right only where a proportionate reason, measured by agape, justifies it.

  5. 5

    Give one criticism of applying proportionalism to immigration policy.

    Model answer

    Proportionality has to be judged by governments answerable to their own electorates. Critics say the weighing will systematically favour the community doing the weighing.

  6. 6

    State the traditional natural law defence of capital punishment.

    Model answer

    Aquinas allowed the state to execute a criminal who threatened the common good, comparing it to removing a diseased limb. Preservation of the ordered society was the justification.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Religious Concepts and Religious Life
Christianity: Social and Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Christianity: Practices That Shape Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Paul lists them at the end of 1 13.
CorinthiansRomansGalatians

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe hymn asks into how many parts the Puruṣa was divided.
BBrāhmaṇa came from the mouth and rājanya from the arms.
CVaiśya came from the thighs and śūdra from the feet.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Dāna is the act of giving.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Deontological Ethics, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.