Eduqas A-Level Religious Studies A120QS
Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsChristianity
Christianity: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeChristianity
Christianity: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtChristianity
Christianity: Practices That Shape Religious IdentityChristianity
Islam: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsIslam
Islam: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeIslam
Islam: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtIslam
Islam: Practices That Shape Religious IdentityIslam
Judaism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsJudaism
Judaism: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeJudaism
Judaism: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtJudaism
Judaism: Practices That Shape Religious IdentityJudaism
Buddhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsBuddhism
Buddhism: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeBuddhism
Buddhism: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtBuddhism
Buddhism: Practices That Shape Religious IdentityBuddhism
Hinduism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsHinduism
Hinduism: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeHinduism
Hinduism: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtHinduism
Hinduism: Practices That Shape Religious IdentityHinduism
Sikhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsSikhism
Sikhism: Religious Concepts and Religious LifeSikhism
Sikhism: Social and Historical Developments in Religious ThoughtSikhism
Sikhism: Practices That Shape Religious IdentitySikhism
Arguments for the Existence of God: Inductive
Arguments for the Existence of God: Deductive
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Religious Belief as a Product of the Human Mind
Religious Experience
Religious Language
Ethical Thought
Deontological Ethics
Teleological Ethics
Determinism
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Mackie's inconsistent triad and the evidential problem
- 3 things to know
- Component 2
Overview
Three claims in Mackie's inconsistent triad, mackie's two additional quasi-logical rules and mackie's paradox of omnipotence.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the three claims in Mackie's inconsistent triad.
What are Mackie's two additional quasi-logical rules?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the three claims in Mackie's inconsistent triad.
Model answer
God is omnipotent, and God is wholly good. Evil exists, and Mackie argues the three claims cannot all be true together.
- 2
What are Mackie's two additional quasi-logical rules?
Model answer
A good thing always eliminates evil as far as it can. Omnipotence has no limits to what it can do.
- 3
Why does Mackie say a theist must abandon one of the three claims?
Model answer
Acceptance of all three, with the two extra rules, produces a straight contradiction. Mackie concludes that theistic belief is positively irrational rather than merely unproved.
- 4
Why does Mackie reject the claim that good cannot exist without evil?
Model answer
Mackie replies that the argument makes God's power depend on a prior necessity. Good would then be limited by something God did not control.
- 5
How does Mackie answer the free will defence?
Model answer
Mackie argues that God could have created free beings who always freely choose the good. Nothing logically impossible lies in such a world, so an omnipotent God could have made it.
- 6
What is Mackie's paradox of omnipotence?
Model answer
Mackie asks whether an omnipotent God can make rules that then bind God. Either answer sets a limit, so unrestricted omnipotence appears incoherent.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The Problem of Evil and Suffering, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.