levo

Poverty, Public Health and the State in Britain, c1780–1939

The Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1905-09

  • 3 things to know
  • Paper 3

Overview

Recall questions on why it was appointed, the Majority and Minority Reports, the Webbs, why no legislation followed, and its influence on later welfare.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What came out of the four-year royal commission on poor relief that reported in 1909?

Key term

Who wrote the Minority Report?

Numbers

Why did the Commission's reports produce no immediate legislation?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What came out of the four-year royal commission on poor relief that reported in 1909?

    Model answer

    Two rival reports: a Majority report favouring a reformed but still deterrent poor law, and a Minority report (backed by the Webbs) urging its abolition and state services to prevent poverty.

  2. 2

    Why was a Royal Commission appointed in 1905?

    Model answer

    Because the Poor Law was widely agreed to be failing, and evidence from Booth and Rowntree had discredited its assumptions about the causes of poverty.

  3. 3

    What did the Majority Report recommend?

    Model answer

    Retaining the Poor Law but renaming and reforming it under public assistance committees, with continued voluntary involvement and a moral distinction between applicants.

  4. 4

    What did the Minority Report recommend?

    Model answer

    Breaking up the Poor Law entirely, distributing its functions to specialist committees for health, education and pensions, with a national minimum guaranteed by the state.

  5. 5

    Who wrote the Minority Report?

    Model answer

    Beatrice and Sidney Webb, with Beatrice a member of the Commission, drawing on Fabian research and their own investigations.

  6. 6

    Why did the Commission's reports produce no immediate legislation?

    Model answer

    The two reports disagreed fundamentally, the government preferred its own insurance-based measures, and the Poor Law survived until 1929.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

The Crusades, c1095–1204
England, 1509–1603: Authority, Nation and Religion
Britain, 1625–1701: Conflict, Revolution and Settlement
Britain, c1785–c1870: Democracy, Protest and Reform

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Luis de .
RequesensAlbaGranvelle

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe government admitted 96 dead and 333 wounded.
BOther estimates run to several hundred dead.
COpponents claimed thousands.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Robert Aske led the Pilgrimage of Grace.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Poverty, Public Health and the State in Britain, c1780–1939, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.