Eduqas A-Level Sociology A200QS
Culture and the Social Construction of Culture
Socialisation and Its Agencies
Socialisation and Identity
Option: Families and HouseholdsFamilies
Option: Youth CulturesYouth cultures
Option: EducationEducation
Option: MediaMedia
Option: ReligionReligion
Research Methods: Primary and Secondary
Sampling, Ethics and Practical Issues
Key Concepts and Theories of Research
Social Inequality: Evidence and Patterns
Theories and Explanations of Inequality and Stratification
Option: Crime and DevianceCrime
Option: Health and DisabilityHealth
Option: PoliticsPolitics
Option: World SociologyWorld sociology
Option: Crime and Deviance
Marxist and neo-Marxist explanations of crime
- 3 things to know
- Component 3 Section B
Overview
Term criminogenic, selective enforcement and neo-Marxist criminology.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How do Marxists explain the existence of crime under capitalism?
Define the term criminogenic.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How do Marxists explain the existence of crime under capitalism?
Model answer
Marxists argue that capitalism is criminogenic. Poverty, competition and the pursuit of profit generate offending at every level of society.
- 2
Define the term criminogenic.
Model answer
Criminogenic means tending to cause crime. Marxists apply the word to capitalism as a system rather than to individuals.
- 3
How did Gordon describe crime as rational?
Model answer
Gordon (1976, USA) argued that crime is a rational response to a competitive and unequal society. Offending is found among all classes, not only the poor.
- 4
In whose interests do Marxists say the law is made?
Model answer
Marxists argue that law reflects the interests of the ruling class. Property law is cited as protecting ownership above need.
- 5
What did Chambliss argue about the origins of vagrancy laws?
Model answer
Chambliss (1975, USA) traced English vagrancy laws to landowners who needed cheap labour. Law was explained by economic interest rather than by shared morality.
- 6
How did Snider describe the state's attitude to corporate regulation?
Model answer
Snider (1993, Canada) argued that capitalist states are reluctant to pass laws that threaten profitability. Regulation is therefore weaker than the scale of harm would justify.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Option: Crime and Deviance, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.