Eduqas A-Level Sociology A200QS
Culture and the Social Construction of Culture
Socialisation and Its Agencies
Socialisation and Identity
Option: Families and HouseholdsFamilies
Option: Youth CulturesYouth cultures
Option: EducationEducation
Option: MediaMedia
Option: ReligionReligion
Research Methods: Primary and Secondary
Sampling, Ethics and Practical Issues
Key Concepts and Theories of Research
Social Inequality: Evidence and Patterns
Theories and Explanations of Inequality and Stratification
Option: Crime and DevianceCrime
Option: Health and DisabilityHealth
Option: PoliticsPolitics
Option: World SociologyWorld sociology
Theories and Explanations of Inequality and Stratification
Postmodernist accounts of inequality
- 3 things to know
- Component 3 Section A
Overview
Postmodernist position on inequality, risk society and criticism of the individualisation thesis.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the strongest criticism of postmodern accounts of inequality?
What have postmodern accounts usefully drawn attention to?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the postmodernist position on inequality?
Model answer
Postmodernists argue that the large structures earlier sociology described have fragmented. Identity is constructed through consumption and choice rather than assigned by position. No single theory can account for the diversity of contemporary experience.
- 2
What did Lyotard argue about metanarratives?
Model answer
Lyotard argued in 1979 that grand explanatory schemes such as Marxism, which claim to account for the whole course of history, have lost credibility, and that knowledge in postmodern conditions is local and plural rather than unified.
- 3
How does the rejection of metanarratives apply to theories of inequality?
Model answer
If no single account can explain society as a whole, then Marxism and functionalism alike are stories rather than science, and inequality must be studied through many partial accounts rather than one comprehensive theory.
- 4
What did Pakulski and Waters argue?
Model answer
Pakulski and Waters argued in 1996 that class is dying as a source of identity and political alignment. Status and cultural difference expressed through consumption have, on their account, become the main axes of social division.
- 5
What evidence is offered for the decline of class?
Model answer
The decline in manufacturing employment and union membership, the weakening link between class and voting, the fall in the number of people identifying with a class, and the rise of political divisions organised around identity and culture.
- 6
What evidence is offered against the decline of class?
Model answer
Class continues to predict health, education, income and life expectancy strongly. Critics such as Marshall argue that a weakening of class identity is not a weakening of class structure, and that the two should not be confused.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Theories and Explanations of Inequality and Stratification, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.