Eduqas A-Level Physics A420QS
Basic Physics
Kinematics
Dynamics
Energy Concepts
Circular Motion
Vibrations
Kinetic Theory
Thermal Physics
Conduction of Electricity
Resistance
D.C. Circuits
Capacitance
Solids Under Stress
Electrostatic and Gravitational Fields of Force
Using Radiation to Investigate Stars
Orbits and the Wider Universe
The Nature of Waves
Wave Properties
Refraction of Light
Photons
Lasers
Nuclear Decay
Particles and Nuclear Structure
Nuclear Energy
Magnetic Fields
Electromagnetic Induction
Option A: Alternating CurrentsOption A
Option B: Medical PhysicsOption B
Option C: The Physics of SportsOption C
Option D: Energy and the EnvironmentOption D
Mathematical Requirements (Appendix C)
How Science Works
Peer review, the scientific community, ethics and society
- 3 things to know
- All three components
Overview
Two things peer review is intended to catch and three limitations of peer review.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give one argument for and one argument against public funding of very expensive fundamental physics research.
Explain the difference between what science can settle and what society must decide, using an energy policy example.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Describe what happens when a paper is submitted to a scientific journal.
Model answer
The editor sends the paper to independent experts working in the same field, who examine the method, the analysis and whether the conclusions follow from the data. They recommend that it be accepted, revised or rejected, and the authors must answer their criticisms before publication.
- 2
State two things peer review is intended to catch.
Model answer
It is intended to catch errors of method or analysis, such as an uncontrolled variable or an underestimated uncertainty. It also catches conclusions that go further than the evidence presented can support.
- 3
State three limitations of peer review.
Model answer
Reviewers work from the written account and cannot usually detect fabricated data, the process is slow enough to delay important results by months, and reviewers may be conservative towards work that challenges the consensus. A reviewer may also have a professional interest in the outcome.
- 4
Why is independent replication a stronger check than peer review?
Model answer
Peer review examines a description of an experiment, whereas replication tests the experiment itself with different apparatus and different people. Only replication can reveal a systematic fault peculiar to the original setup.
- 5
Why does publishing the full method matter as much as publishing the result?
Model answer
Others cannot repeat or challenge a measurement unless they know exactly how it was made. A result whose method is withheld cannot be checked and therefore carries very little weight.
- 6
What role do conferences and preprints play, and what is their weakness?
Model answer
They circulate new results quickly, months or years before formal publication, which lets other groups begin follow-up work. They carry no independent check, so a result announced that way may not survive review.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in How Science Works, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.