OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Child Psychology
Barkley-Levenson and Galvan (2014) expected value in the adolescent brain: results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on Barkley-Levenson and Galvan's gambling task, the behavioural and neural findings on expected value, their conclusion that adolescent risk-taking is not simply irrational, and the evaluation of method, ecological validity, sample and ethics.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why do the findings suggest adolescent risk-taking is not simply irrational?
What were the behavioural findings?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the gambling task involve?
Model answer
On each trial participants saw a spinner offering an even chance of winning one stated amount or losing another, with the alternative of rejecting it and gaining and losing nothing; they pressed a button to accept or reject.
- 2
What was systematically varied across trials?
Model answer
The expected value of the gamble was varied by changing the size of the possible gain and loss, so that trials ranged from negative through zero to strongly positive expected value.
- 3
What were the behavioural findings?
Model answer
Acceptance rates did not differ significantly between adolescents and adults at any expected-value level. What differed was sensitivity to expected value: adolescents' willingness to accept rose more steeply as expected value increased.
- 4
What was the key neural finding?
Model answer
Adolescents showed greater activation in the ventral striatum, which increased as the expected value of the gamble rose, whereas adults showed no comparable increase.
- 5
State the conclusion of Barkley-Levenson and Galvan (2014).
Model answer
The adolescent brain represents expected value differently from the adult brain, with a reward system that is hypersensitive to increasing potential gains, and this heightened sensitivity underlies greater willingness to take risks.
- 6
Why do the findings suggest adolescent risk-taking is not simply irrational?
Model answer
Adolescents responded most strongly to gambles that were genuinely worth taking, so their heightened reward sensitivity was tracking real value rather than ignoring it.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Child Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.