OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Environmental Psychology
Czeisler et al. (1982) rotating shift schedules: outcomes, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on Czeisler et al.'s findings on schedule satisfaction, turnover and output, their conclusion, and the evaluation of strengths, sample, self-report reliability, alternative explanations and applying 21-day rotations elsewhere.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Suggest one explanation for the improvement other than the new schedule.
What happened to schedule satisfaction after the change?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What happened to schedule satisfaction after the change?
Model answer
Satisfaction improved once the rotation ran forwards, and it was highest among the workers on the 21-day rotation.
- 2
What happened to the company's turnover and output?
Model answer
Staff turnover fell and plant productivity rose after the schedules were redesigned.
- 3
What did Czeisler et al. conclude?
Model answer
Shift schedules designed around circadian principles, rotating forwards and changing less often, improve workers' sleep, health and satisfaction and also benefit the organisation.
- 4
What are two strengths of the study?
Model answer
It was carried out in a real workplace with real shift workers, giving high ecological validity, and it produced a practical change that could be tested against objective productivity and turnover data.
- 5
What are two weaknesses of the sample?
Model answer
All the participants were men at a single plant in one country, so the findings may not generalise to women or to other industries.
- 6
Why might the self-report measures be unreliable?
Model answer
Workers may have given socially desirable answers or responded to demand characteristics, especially if they hoped that taking part would lead to a better schedule.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Environmental Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.