levo

Environmental Psychology

Czeisler et al. (1982) rotating shift schedules: outcomes, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 03

Overview

Recall questions on Czeisler et al.'s findings on schedule satisfaction, turnover and output, their conclusion, and the evaluation of strengths, sample, self-report reliability, alternative explanations and applying 21-day rotations elsewhere.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Study

What are two weaknesses of the sample?

Key term

Suggest one explanation for the improvement other than the new schedule.

Key term

What happened to schedule satisfaction after the change?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What happened to schedule satisfaction after the change?

    Model answer

    Satisfaction improved once the rotation ran forwards, and it was highest among the workers on the 21-day rotation.

  2. 2

    What happened to the company's turnover and output?

    Model answer

    Staff turnover fell and plant productivity rose after the schedules were redesigned.

  3. 3

    What did Czeisler et al. conclude?

    Model answer

    Shift schedules designed around circadian principles, rotating forwards and changing less often, improve workers' sleep, health and satisfaction and also benefit the organisation.

  4. 4

    What are two strengths of the study?

    Model answer

    It was carried out in a real workplace with real shift workers, giving high ecological validity, and it produced a practical change that could be tested against objective productivity and turnover data.

  5. 5

    What are two weaknesses of the sample?

    Model answer

    All the participants were men at a single plant in one country, so the findings may not generalise to women or to other industries.

  6. 6

    Why might the self-report measures be unreliable?

    Model answer

    Workers may have given socially desirable answers or responded to demand characteristics, especially if they hoped that taking part would lead to a better schedule.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Environmental Psychology, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.