levo

Core Studies: Social Area

Levine et al. (2001) cross-cultural altruism: conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Levine et al.'s conclusions and the evaluation of their field measures, cross-cultural design, standardisation across countries, ethnocentrism, one city per country, ethical issues, correlational findings and type of data.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Study

How might Levine's study be criticised as ethnocentric?

Evaluation

Why can Levine not claim that economic prosperity causes lower helping?

Evaluation

Give one strength of Levine's use of field measures.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What did Levine conclude?

    Model answer

    Willingness to help a stranger varies substantially between cultures and is best predicted by a community's economic conditions and cultural values rather than by its size or density.

  2. 2

    Give one strength of Levine's use of field measures.

    Model answer

    The pedestrians were unaware they were being studied and were going about their ordinary business, so the behaviour recorded has high ecological validity.

  3. 3

    Give one strength of Levine's cross-cultural design.

    Model answer

    Using the same three standardised situations in 23 countries allows helping to be compared directly across cultures rather than assumed from one country's findings.

  4. 4

    Explain one problem with standardising Levine's procedures across 23 countries.

    Model answer

    Traffic conditions, street layouts and what counts as a downtown business district differ between cities, so the situations were not identical for every participant.

  5. 5

    How might Levine's study be criticised as ethnocentric?

    Model answer

    The three helping situations were designed from a Western viewpoint, and the same act may carry a different social meaning in different cultures, so the measures may not be equivalent.

  6. 6

    Why does testing only one city per country limit Levine's conclusions?

    Model answer

    A single large city cannot represent a whole country, since helping in rural areas or smaller towns may be very different.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Social Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.