OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Criminal Psychology
Persuading juries: speech style, expert witnesses, order of evidence and publicity
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on powerful and powerless speech, expert witnesses, primacy and recency, the story model, inadmissible evidence, pre-trial publicity, the problem of defendant characteristics for justice, predicting jury responses, and the limits of mock jury research.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why does telling jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence often fail?
Why are effects of defendant characteristics on verdicts regarded as a serious problem for justice?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Distinguish powerful from powerless speech in a witness.
Model answer
Powerful speech is direct and fluent, while powerless speech is full of hedges, hesitations, intensifiers and rising intonation; the powerless style leads jurors to see the witness as less competent and less believable.
- 2
When is an expert witness most persuasive to a jury?
Model answer
When their evidence is clear, is directly relevant to the facts in issue, and they appear independent rather than a hired advocate for one side.
- 3
How do primacy and recency affect a jury's view of the evidence?
Model answer
Evidence heard first sets the framework through which the rest is interpreted, while evidence heard last is freshest in mind during deliberation, so both ends of the case carry extra weight.
- 4
Outline the story model of juror decision making.
Model answer
Jurors do not weigh each item of evidence separately but construct a narrative that best accounts for what they have heard, then choose the verdict that fits that story.
- 5
Why does telling jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence often fail?
Model answer
The instruction draws attention to the material and can provoke reactance, so jurors think about it more and may weight it more heavily than if nothing had been said.
- 6
How can pre-trial publicity prejudice a jury?
Model answer
Jurors arrive having already absorbed a version of events and often forget which details came from the media rather than the evidence, so they judge the case against a story formed before the trial began.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.