levo

Criminal Psychology

Hall and Player (2008) emotional context and fingerprint analysis: results, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 03

Overview

Recall questions on Hall and Player's follow-up questionnaire, how many experts read the report and felt affected, the finding on actual decisions, their conclusion, differences from Dror's findings, and the strengths, artificiality and self-report limitations of the study.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

What proportion of each group said they had been affected by the context?

Study

Why should the self-report data be treated with caution?

Who and when

What did the follow-up questionnaire ask?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What did the follow-up questionnaire ask?

    Model answer

    Whether the examiner had read the crime scene report and, if so, whether they believed the emotional context had affected their analysis.

  2. 2

    How many of the seventy experts had read the crime scene report?

    Model answer

    Fifty-seven of them read it.

  3. 3

    What proportion of each group said they had been affected by the context?

    Model answer

    About 52% of those in the high emotional context group said they were affected, compared with about 6% in the low emotional context group.

  4. 4

    What was the key finding about the examiners' actual decisions?

    Model answer

    There was no statistically significant difference between the high and low context groups in the conclusions they reached about the mark.

  5. 5

    State the conclusion Hall and Player drew.

    Model answer

    Emotional context made experts feel affected but did not change their final judgements, suggesting that experienced examiners working to a standard procedure are not readily biased on an ambiguous mark.

  6. 6

    Give one strength of Hall and Player's study.

    Model answer

    It used genuine fingerprint experts working with real materials and a real ten-print form, so the task closely resembled their everyday work.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Psychology, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.