OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Criminal Psychology
Hall and Player (2008) emotional context and fingerprint analysis: results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on Hall and Player's follow-up questionnaire, how many experts read the report and felt affected, the finding on actual decisions, their conclusion, differences from Dror's findings, and the strengths, artificiality and self-report limitations of the study.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why should the self-report data be treated with caution?
What did the follow-up questionnaire ask?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the follow-up questionnaire ask?
Model answer
Whether the examiner had read the crime scene report and, if so, whether they believed the emotional context had affected their analysis.
- 2
How many of the seventy experts had read the crime scene report?
Model answer
Fifty-seven of them read it.
- 3
What proportion of each group said they had been affected by the context?
Model answer
About 52% of those in the high emotional context group said they were affected, compared with about 6% in the low emotional context group.
- 4
What was the key finding about the examiners' actual decisions?
Model answer
There was no statistically significant difference between the high and low context groups in the conclusions they reached about the mark.
- 5
State the conclusion Hall and Player drew.
Model answer
Emotional context made experts feel affected but did not change their final judgements, suggesting that experienced examiners working to a standard procedure are not readily biased on an ambiguous mark.
- 6
Give one strength of Hall and Player's study.
Model answer
It used genuine fingerprint experts working with real materials and a real ten-print form, so the task closely resembled their everyday work.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.