levo

Core Studies: Developmental Area

Lee et al. (1997) evaluations of lying and truth-telling: procedure, results and conclusions

  • 2 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Lee et al.'s symbol scale, interview procedure and counterbalancing, separate ratings of deed and statement, the cross-cultural similarity and difference, the age pattern and its importance, and the conclusions.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Process

Why were the stories presented in a counterbalanced order?

Who and when

What did Lee et al. conclude?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Why was the scale marked with symbols rather than numbers?

    Model answer

    So that children as young as seven could show the strength of their judgement without needing to read or interpret numbers.

  2. 2

    How was each child interviewed?

    Model answer

    Children were interviewed individually in a quiet room at school in their own language, the stories were read aloud in a counterbalanced order, and after each one the child rated the deed and then rated what the character had said.

  3. 3

    Why were the stories presented in a counterbalanced order?

    Model answer

    To prevent the order in which stories were heard from systematically influencing the ratings given.

  4. 4

    Why did children rate the deed and the statement separately?

    Model answer

    So that judgement of the action itself could be separated from judgement of the honesty or dishonesty of what was said about it.

  5. 5

    What similarity was found between the two cultures?

    Model answer

    Children in both countries rated good deeds positively and bad deeds negatively, and in the antisocial stories both groups condemned lying and approved of telling the truth.

  6. 6

    State the main cultural difference found.

    Model answer

    In the prosocial stories Chinese children rated the character who modestly denied the good deed increasingly positively and rated owning up less positively, whereas Canadian children continued to treat the denial as wrong and admitting it as right.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Developmental Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.