levo

Core Studies: Cognitive Area

Moray (1959) auditory attention: conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Moray's overall conclusion and the cocktail party phenomenon, and the evaluation of reliability, the ecological validity of shadowing, the sample, the type of data, ethics and applications such as air traffic control.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Who and when

What did Moray conclude overall?

Evaluation

What ethical points arise from this study?

Evaluation

Give one strength of the study relating to reliability.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What did Moray conclude overall?

    Model answer

    Almost none of the rejected message is processed for meaning, but a small class of personally significant material can break through, so attention acts as a highly selective block rather than a perfect one.

  2. 2

    How do Moray's findings explain the cocktail party phenomenon?

    Model answer

    Because a person's own name can break through the block, someone absorbed in one conversation at a party may still notice their name spoken across the room.

  3. 3

    Give one strength of the study relating to reliability.

    Model answer

    The taped messages, matched volume and standardised instructions mean the procedure can be repeated exactly and produces consistent results.

  4. 4

    Why can the ecological validity of the shadowing task be questioned?

    Model answer

    Shadowing a prose passage through headphones is unlike everyday listening, where people can watch the speaker and use the context of a conversation.

  5. 5

    Give one criticism of the sample.

    Model answer

    The samples were small and drawn from undergraduates and research workers, an unusually well-educated group who may be practised at demanding cognitive tasks.

  6. 6

    Give one limitation of the type of data collected.

    Model answer

    The recognition and detection scores are easy to compare but say nothing about what participants actually experienced while shadowing.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Cognitive Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.