levo

Core Studies: Social Area

Piliavin et al. (1969) subway Samaritans: results and findings

  • 4 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Piliavin et al.'s results on helping the cane and drunk victims, speed of help, sex and race of helpers, group size, passengers leaving the critical area, the model conditions, and passengers' comments.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Compare the median times taken to help the two types of victim.

Key term

Why did the model conditions produce so little useful data?

Who and when

What did Piliavin find about the sex of the first helper?

Who and when

What did Piliavin note about the comments made by passengers?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How often was the ill victim carrying a cane helped?

    Model answer

    He received spontaneous help on 62 of the 65 trials, roughly 95% of the time.

  2. 2

    How often was the drunk victim helped?

    Model answer

    He received spontaneous help on 19 of the 38 trials, about 50% of the time.

  3. 3

    Compare the median times taken to help the two types of victim.

    Model answer

    The cane victim was helped after a median of 5 seconds, while the drunk victim was helped after a median of 109 seconds.

  4. 4

    What did Piliavin find about the sex of the first helper?

    Model answer

    About 90% of first helpers were men, even though men made up only around 60% of the passengers.

  5. 5

    What did Piliavin find about the race of helpers?

    Model answer

    There was a slight tendency for people to help a victim of their own race, and this same-race effect was clearer when the victim appeared drunk.

  6. 6

    What did Piliavin find about the effect of group size on helping?

    Model answer

    There was no diffusion of responsibility — help came as quickly or more quickly when more people were present.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Social Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.