OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Moray (1959) auditory attention: procedure, results and findings
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on Moray's recognition test and its unpresented words, the results of the first experiment, the second experiment on names in the rejected message and the attentional block, and the procedure, result and conclusion of the third experiment.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What were the results of the second experiment?
What were the results of the first experiment?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the recognition test consist of?
Model answer
Participants were shown twenty-one words: seven from the shadowed passage, seven from the repeated rejected list and seven that had never been presented.
- 2
Why were words that had never been presented included in the recognition test?
Model answer
They provided a baseline for guessing, so recognition of the rejected words could be judged against chance rather than against zero.
- 3
What were the results of the first experiment?
Model answer
Participants recognised on average about 4.9 words from the shadowed passage, 1.9 from the rejected list and 2.6 that had never been played.
- 4
What was investigated in the second experiment?
Model answer
Whether an affective cue, namely the participant's own name, could break through the attentional block.
- 5
How was the second experiment carried out?
Model answer
While participants shadowed passages, short instructions were inserted into the rejected ear, sometimes introduced by the participant's own name and sometimes not.
- 6
What were the results of the second experiment?
Model answer
Instructions preceded by the participant's own name were heard on twenty of thirty-nine occasions, compared with only four of thirty-six when the name was absent.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Cognitive Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.