OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Sport and Exercise Psychology
Fazey and Hardy (1988) catastrophe model: predictions, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on the catastrophe model's predictions under high cognitive anxiety, hysteresis, intermediate performance, the butterfly model, whether physiological arousal is harmful, Fazey and Hardy's conclusion, and the strengths and weaknesses of their work.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is meant by the prediction of hysteresis?
Which two further variables did Fazey and Hardy add in their higher-order butterfly model, and what does each do?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does the model predict when cognitive anxiety is high?
Model answer
Performance climbs to a higher peak as physiological arousal rises, but once the critical point is passed it drops suddenly and catastrophically to a very low level.
- 2
What is meant by the prediction of hysteresis?
Model answer
Under high cognitive anxiety the path performance takes as arousal increases is not the path it takes as arousal decreases, so a performer who has crashed must lower arousal far below the point of collapse before recovering.
- 3
What does the model predict about intermediate levels of performance under high cognitive anxiety?
Model answer
Middling performances become very unlikely, because the performer is pulled onto either the upper or the lower surface rather than settling in between.
- 4
Which two further variables did Fazey and Hardy add in their higher-order butterfly model, and what does each do?
Model answer
Task difficulty enters as a bias factor that shifts the point of collapse, and self-confidence enters as a butterfly factor that gives an anxious performer a route back to stable performance.
- 5
Is physiological arousal always harmful according to Fazey and Hardy?
Model answer
No, they predicted that physiological arousal is not necessarily damaging and can even help, but that it becomes catastrophic when cognitive anxiety is high.
- 6
What did Fazey and Hardy conclude?
Model answer
They concluded that the inverted-U hypothesis is flawed and is not the only plausible model, and that catastrophe models can describe the joint contributions of cognitive anxiety, arousal on the day, task difficulty and self-confidence.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Sport and Exercise Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.