OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
- 9 subtopics
- 26 things to know
- Component 02
What Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework covers
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework is examined on component 02 of OCR Psychology, Psychological themes through core studies. 104 recall questions across 9 subtopics.
Where it is assessed
Component 02
Psychological themes through core studies, the synoptic paper.
Check the OCR specification ↗The 9 subtopics
Each one has its own page.
- Background, aims, design and sample of a core studyRecall questions on the four parts of a core study's story, background, aims and hypotheses, experimental designs, measuring the dependent variable, the sample and sampling techniques, and the materials section.Open →
- Procedure, results and conclusions of a core studyRecall questions on describing a standardised procedure, the difference between results and conclusions, strong conclusions, correlation and causation, reporting excluded participants, and using several measures and qualitative observations.Open →
- Comparing classic and contemporary studies in their pairsRecall questions on why core studies are paired, classic and contemporary studies, features to compare within a pair, and what a contemporary study adds when it finds the same result in another decade or country.Open →
- Individual, social and cultural diversity in paired studiesRecall questions on individual, social and cultural diversity, ethnocentrism, how a contemporary study can develop or challenge a classic study, Western and student samples, and how to compare a pair of studies properly.Open →
- Research methods and techniques across the core studiesRecall questions on laboratory, field and quasi experiments in the core studies, naturalistic, controlled, covert and participant observations, questionnaires, structured and unstructured interviews, and what correlational analysis shows.Open →
- Types of data and validity across the core studiesRecall questions on quantitative and qualitative data, primary and secondary data, internal, ecological, population, face and concurrent validity with core study examples, demand characteristics, and social desirability in Chaney et al.Open →
- Reliability, ethics, sampling bias and ethnocentrism across the core studiesRecall questions on researcher bias, inter-rater, test-retest and split-half reliability, the BPS ethical principles, debriefing, deception and protection from harm, sampling bias in Milgram and other studies, ethnocentrism and generalisability.Open →
- The five areas of psychology and their key themesRecall questions on the five areas of psychology, the central assumption of each area, what a key theme is, and which two key themes sit within each of the five areas.Open →
- Relating each core study to its area of psychologyRecall questions on why Milgram, Piliavin, Loftus and Palmer, Grant, Bandura, Sperry and Baron-Cohen belong to their areas, the behaviourist and psychodynamic perspectives in the core studies, and studies that fit more than one area.Open →
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is a covert observation and what is its main advantage?
Under what circumstances might deception be considered acceptable?
Which area of psychology do Loftus and Palmer's eyewitness research and Grant's context-dependent memory research illustrate, and why?
Distinguish between the aim of a study and its hypothesis.
Distinguish between a target population and a sample.
Why can two studies with different methods be difficult to compare directly?
Why does replicating a classic study exactly tell us less than adapting it?
Distinguish between quantitative and qualitative data.
Which two key themes sit within the developmental area?
Explain the difference between the results and the conclusions of a study.
Give one reason why a contemporary study often has fewer ethical problems than its classic partner.
Explain what is meant by cultural diversity.
Give one strength and one weakness of the laboratory experiment as a method.
What does a correlational analysis show?
Explain test–retest reliability.
Name the five areas of psychology into which the core studies are placed.
Bandura's transmission of aggression research is placed in which area, and why?
What belongs in the background of a study?
Why should a conclusion not be drawn about cause and effect from a correlation?
Explain what is meant by social diversity.
Distinguish between a naturalistic and a controlled observation.
Give one strength of quantitative data and one strength of qualitative data.
What does split-half reliability assess?
State the central assumption of the social area.
Which perspective in psychology do Bandura's and Chaney's studies both illustrate?
Take Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework further
The same content, four other ways.
Commonly confused
Pairs that lose marks when they are blurred together.
Classic study vs Contemporary study
Classic study: the older of a pair of core studies, which established the key theme. Contemporary study: the more recent of a pair, which revisits the same theme with newer methods.
Internal validity vs Ecological validity
Internal validity: the extent to which a study measured what it set out to, free of confounding variables. Ecological validity: the extent to which findings hold outside the setting and task of the study.
Ethnocentrism vs Generalisability
Ethnocentrism: judging other cultures by the standards of one's own, often through Western measures and samples. Generalisability: the extent to which findings can be applied beyond the sample studied.
Questions from this topic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What are the four main parts of the 'story' you should be able to tell about any core study?
Model answer
The background, the method, the results and the conclusions — with the method itself comprising the design, the sample, the materials or apparatus and the procedure.
- 2
What belongs in the background of a study?
Model answer
The earlier theory and research that prompted the study, the gap or problem it left, and the aim that follows from it.
- 3
Distinguish between the aim of a study and its hypothesis.
Model answer
The aim is a broad statement of what the researcher wants to find out, whereas the hypothesis is a precise, testable prediction about the relationship between the variables.
- 4
What is meant by the design of a study?
Model answer
The overall structure of the investigation — the method used, the variables, how conditions are arranged and how extraneous variables are controlled.
- 5
Name the three experimental designs you may need to identify in a core study.
Model answer
Repeated measures, independent measures and matched participants.
- 6
Explain one strength and one weakness of an independent measures design.
Model answer
Order effects are avoided because each participant does only one condition, but participant variables may differ between the groups and confound the results.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework revision questions
- What does Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework cover in OCR A-Level Psychology?
- 9 subtopics: background, aims, design and sample of a core study, procedure, results and conclusions of a core study, comparing classic and contemporary studies in their pairs, individual, social and cultural diversity in paired studies, research methods and techniques across the core studies, types of data and validity across the core studies, reliability, ethics, sampling bias and ethnocentrism across the core studies, the five areas of psychology and their key themes and relating each core study to its area of psychology. Each one has its own page with questions and model answers.
- How is Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework organised?
- By the OCR H567 specification, subtopic by subtopic, so it matches the order you are taught it in.
Every question in Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.