levo

Core Studies: Cognitive Area

Grant et al. (1998) context-dependent memory: results, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Grant et al.'s findings on matching study and test contexts, short-answer and multiple-choice results, conclusions, advice for students, and the evaluation of control, mundane realism, sample, noise presentation and ethics.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Were there any ethical concerns with this study?

Who and when

Did studying in noise itself damage learning?

Key term

Give the approximate short-answer results.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What was the main finding about matching contexts?

    Model answer

    Both matching conditions produced better performance than both mismatching conditions, on the short-answer test and on the multiple-choice test.

  2. 2

    Did studying in noise itself damage learning?

    Model answer

    No, there was no significant effect of noise on its own, so studying in noise was not in itself worse than studying in silence.

  3. 3

    Give the approximate short-answer results.

    Model answer

    The matching conditions averaged roughly 6.7 and 6.2 out of 10, while the mismatching conditions averaged roughly 5.4 and 4.6 out of 10.

  4. 4

    Give the approximate multiple-choice results.

    Model answer

    The matching conditions averaged about 14.3 out of 16 and the mismatching conditions about 12.7 out of 16.

  5. 5

    What did Grant et al. conclude?

    Model answer

    Context-dependent memory applies to meaningful academic material, so performance is best when the environment at study matches the environment at test.

  6. 6

    What practical advice for students follows from the findings?

    Model answer

    Students should revise in conditions resembling the examination room, that is in silence, so that the study context matches the retrieval context.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Cognitive Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.