OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Grant et al. (1998) context-dependent memory: results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on Grant et al.'s findings on matching study and test contexts, short-answer and multiple-choice results, conclusions, advice for students, and the evaluation of control, mundane realism, sample, noise presentation and ethics.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Did studying in noise itself damage learning?
Give the approximate short-answer results.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What was the main finding about matching contexts?
Model answer
Both matching conditions produced better performance than both mismatching conditions, on the short-answer test and on the multiple-choice test.
- 2
Did studying in noise itself damage learning?
Model answer
No, there was no significant effect of noise on its own, so studying in noise was not in itself worse than studying in silence.
- 3
Give the approximate short-answer results.
Model answer
The matching conditions averaged roughly 6.7 and 6.2 out of 10, while the mismatching conditions averaged roughly 5.4 and 4.6 out of 10.
- 4
Give the approximate multiple-choice results.
Model answer
The matching conditions averaged about 14.3 out of 16 and the mismatching conditions about 12.7 out of 16.
- 5
What did Grant et al. conclude?
Model answer
Context-dependent memory applies to meaningful academic material, so performance is best when the environment at study matches the environment at test.
- 6
What practical advice for students follows from the findings?
Model answer
Students should revise in conditions resembling the examination room, that is in silence, so that the study context matches the retrieval context.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Cognitive Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.