levo

Core Studies: Developmental Area

Chaney et al. (2004) Funhaler study: results, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Chaney et al.'s findings on medicating children, breathing cycles, children's attitudes and parents, their conclusions, and the evaluation of ecological validity, repeated measures, order of devices, data, generalisation and ethics.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

State the finding about breathing cycles per dose.

Evaluation

How well does the study meet ethical standards?

Who and when

What did parents report about medicating their child the previous evening?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What did parents report about medicating their child the previous evening?

    Model answer

    Eighty-one per cent of parents reported having medicated their child the previous evening when using the Funhaler, compared with fifty-nine per cent when using the existing device.

  2. 2

    State the finding about breathing cycles per dose.

    Model answer

    Eighty per cent of children achieved the recommended four or more cycles per dose with the Funhaler, compared with fifty per cent using the existing spacer.

  3. 3

    What did parents report about their children's attitude to treatment?

    Model answer

    Parents described far fewer problems persuading their child to take the medication and reported that children were much more often happy to use the device.

  4. 4

    What effect did the device appear to have on the parents themselves?

    Model answer

    Parents were more satisfied with the device and more willing to give the medication, so the reinforcement changed the parent's behaviour as well as the child's.

  5. 5

    What did Chaney et al. conclude?

    Model answer

    Building immediate rewards into a medical device can substantially improve adherence in young children, which should in turn improve control of their asthma.

  6. 6

    What wider point does the study make about improving treatment?

    Model answer

    Simple and inexpensive changes to the design of a treatment can achieve what instructing and persuading families often fails to achieve.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Developmental Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.