OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Chaney et al. (2004) Funhaler study: results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on Chaney et al.'s findings on medicating children, breathing cycles, children's attitudes and parents, their conclusions, and the evaluation of ecological validity, repeated measures, order of devices, data, generalisation and ethics.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How well does the study meet ethical standards?
What did parents report about medicating their child the previous evening?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did parents report about medicating their child the previous evening?
Model answer
Eighty-one per cent of parents reported having medicated their child the previous evening when using the Funhaler, compared with fifty-nine per cent when using the existing device.
- 2
State the finding about breathing cycles per dose.
Model answer
Eighty per cent of children achieved the recommended four or more cycles per dose with the Funhaler, compared with fifty per cent using the existing spacer.
- 3
What did parents report about their children's attitude to treatment?
Model answer
Parents described far fewer problems persuading their child to take the medication and reported that children were much more often happy to use the device.
- 4
What effect did the device appear to have on the parents themselves?
Model answer
Parents were more satisfied with the device and more willing to give the medication, so the reinforcement changed the parent's behaviour as well as the child's.
- 5
What did Chaney et al. conclude?
Model answer
Building immediate rewards into a medical device can substantially improve adherence in young children, which should in turn improve control of their asthma.
- 6
What wider point does the study make about improving treatment?
Model answer
Simple and inexpensive changes to the design of a treatment can achieve what instructing and persuading families often fails to achieve.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Developmental Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.