OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Sport and Exercise Psychology
Munroe-Chandler et al. (2008) imagery and confidence in youth football: results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on Munroe-Chandler et al.'s correlations between imagery and confidence, sex and level of play, regression findings for self-confidence and self-efficacy, their conclusion, and the strengths and weaknesses of the study.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Were there differences between boys and girls, or between the two levels of play?
Give two strengths of Munroe-Chandler et al.'s study.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the correlations between imagery and the confidence measures show?
Model answer
All correlations between the imagery subscales and the two confidence measures were positive and significant, ranging from moderate to strong, and mastery imagery correlated most strongly with both.
- 2
Were there differences between boys and girls, or between the two levels of play?
Model answer
No significant differences were found for gender or level of play on any of the imagery functions, on self-confidence or on self-efficacy.
- 3
What did the regression analyses reveal about self-confidence in each group?
Model answer
In the recreational players mastery imagery accounted for 50.6% of the variance with arousal and motivational specific imagery adding a further 12.7%, while in the competitive players mastery imagery was the only significant predictor and accounted for 39.6%.
- 4
Summarise the findings for self-efficacy in the two groups.
Model answer
Mastery imagery was the only significant predictor in both groups, accounting for 51.6% of the variance in the recreational players and 57% in the competitive players.
- 5
What did Munroe-Chandler et al. conclude?
Model answer
Mastery imagery significantly predicts both self-confidence and self-efficacy in young footballers, and this holds whatever level they play at, so young athletes wanting more confidence should be encouraged to use mastery imagery.
- 6
Give two strengths of Munroe-Chandler et al.'s study.
Model answer
The sample was reasonably large and drawn from both sexes and both levels of play, and the use of established child versions of the questionnaires makes the measures appropriate and comparable with other research.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Sport and Exercise Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.