levo

Criminal Psychology

Dixon et al. (2002) accent and perceptions of guilt: results, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 03

Overview

Recall questions on Dixon et al.'s findings on accent, the highest guilt ratings, speech ratings and guilt, their conclusion, and the evaluation of method, ecological validity, sample and relevance to persuading juries.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Study

What relationship was found between the speech ratings and attributions of guilt?

Evaluation

Give one strength of Dixon et al.'s method.

Key term

State the main finding on accent.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    State the main finding on accent.

    Model answer

    The Birmingham-accented suspect was rated significantly more guilty, with a mean of 4.27, than the standard-accented suspect, with a mean of 3.65.

  2. 2

    Which combination of conditions produced the highest guilt ratings of all?

    Model answer

    A Birmingham-accented black suspect accused of the blue-collar crime of armed robbery.

  3. 3

    What relationship was found between the speech ratings and attributions of guilt?

    Model answer

    Suspects rated lower for superiority and social attractiveness were rated as more guilty, indicating that accent influenced guilt judgements partly through these stereotypes.

  4. 4

    State the conclusion Dixon et al. drew.

    Model answer

    Accent affects attributions of guilt, with a low-prestige regional accent increasing perceived guilt, and this bias becomes strongest when it combines with the suspect's race and a stereotypically matching crime.

  5. 5

    Give one strength of Dixon et al.'s method.

    Model answer

    Control was high: a single actor recorded both accents, the script was identical and participants were randomly allocated, so differences can be attributed to the manipulated variables.

  6. 6

    Give one weakness relating to the ecological validity of Dixon et al.'s study.

    Model answer

    Participants judged a two-minute recording with no other evidence, no judge's direction and no deliberation with fellow jurors, and their decision had no consequences for anyone.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Psychology, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.