OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Baron-Cohen et al. (1997) autism in adults: further results, conclusions and evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on Baron-Cohen et al.'s findings on sex differences and IQ, their conclusion about a specific deficit, and the evaluation of the design, ecological validity, forced choice format, vocabulary and applications.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why might vocabulary confound the results?
What sex difference emerged in the comparison group?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What sex difference emerged in the comparison group?
Model answer
Women scored significantly higher than men on the Eyes Task.
- 2
Was Eyes Task performance related to IQ in the autism group?
Model answer
No, there was no significant correlation, so the deficit could not be explained by general intelligence.
- 3
State the main conclusion of Baron-Cohen et al.'s study.
Model answer
Adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome have a subtle but genuine theory of mind deficit that persists into adulthood despite normal intelligence.
- 4
Why is the deficit described as specific rather than general?
Model answer
The same participants performed normally on face perception and basic emotion tasks, so only the attribution of complex mental states was impaired.
- 5
Give two strengths of the design.
Model answer
The two comparison groups ruled out alternative explanations of a low score, and the standardised materials and scoring make the study straightforward to replicate.
- 6
Criticise the ecological validity of the Eyes Task.
Model answer
Judging a still black and white photograph of a stranger's eyes, with no voice, movement or social context, is very different from reading someone's mind in a real conversation.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Individual Differences Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.