levo

Core Studies: Individual Differences Area

Baron-Cohen et al. (1997) autism in adults: further results, conclusions and evaluation

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on Baron-Cohen et al.'s findings on sex differences and IQ, their conclusion about a specific deficit, and the evaluation of the design, ecological validity, forced choice format, vocabulary and applications.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Why is the deficit described as specific rather than general?

Key term

Why might vocabulary confound the results?

Key term

What sex difference emerged in the comparison group?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What sex difference emerged in the comparison group?

    Model answer

    Women scored significantly higher than men on the Eyes Task.

  2. 2

    Was Eyes Task performance related to IQ in the autism group?

    Model answer

    No, there was no significant correlation, so the deficit could not be explained by general intelligence.

  3. 3

    State the main conclusion of Baron-Cohen et al.'s study.

    Model answer

    Adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome have a subtle but genuine theory of mind deficit that persists into adulthood despite normal intelligence.

  4. 4

    Why is the deficit described as specific rather than general?

    Model answer

    The same participants performed normally on face perception and basic emotion tasks, so only the attribution of complex mental states was impaired.

  5. 5

    Give two strengths of the design.

    Model answer

    The two comparison groups ruled out alternative explanations of a low score, and the standardised materials and scoring make the study straightforward to replicate.

  6. 6

    Criticise the ecological validity of the Eyes Task.

    Model answer

    Judging a still black and white photograph of a stranger's eyes, with no voice, movement or social context, is very different from reading someone's mind in a real conversation.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Individual Differences Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.