OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Child Psychology
Gibson and Walk (1960) the visual cliff
- 3 things to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on Gibson and Walk's 1960 visual cliff study, including the apparatus, human sample and procedure, the results for infants, chicks, lambs, rats and dark-reared kittens, the conclusion about depth perception, and its strengths, validity and ethics.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why can the study not prove that depth perception is innate in humans?
Who made up the human sample?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the aim of Gibson and Walk (1960).
Model answer
They aimed to investigate whether depth perception is innate or learned, by testing whether human infants and newly mobile animals would avoid an apparent drop.
- 2
What did the visual cliff apparatus consist of?
Model answer
A large sheet of thick glass formed a single level surface; on the shallow side a patterned cloth lay directly beneath the glass, on the deep side the same pattern lay on the floor well below it, and a raised centre board divided the two.
- 3
Why was glass laid across both the shallow and the deep side?
Model answer
So that the surface felt identical on both sides and the only difference between them was visual, and so that no participant could actually fall.
- 4
Who made up the human sample?
Model answer
Thirty-six infants aged between 6 and 14 months took part, all of them old enough to crawl, and each was tested with their mother present.
- 5
What happened to each infant during the procedure?
Model answer
Each baby was placed on the centre board and the mother called and beckoned to them, first from the deep side and then from the shallow side.
- 6
What were the results for the human infants?
Model answer
Twenty-seven of the 36 infants crawled off the board onto the shallow side, while only three ventured onto the deep side; several crawled away from the mother or cried when she called from the cliff side.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Child Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.