levo

Criminal Psychology

Raine et al. (1997) brain abnormalities in murderers: further findings, conclusions and evaluation

  • 2 things to know
  • Component 03

Overview

Recall questions on Raine et al.'s findings on task performance and the corpus callosum, their conclusion and what it does not show, and the evaluation of method, sample, causation, social sensitivity and what makes a criminal.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

How might reduced activity in the corpus callosum contribute to violence?

Evaluation

Give one methodological strength of Raine et al.'s study.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Did the two groups differ in their performance on the task, and why does this matter?

    Model answer

    There was no significant difference in performance, so the metabolic differences cannot be dismissed as the murderers simply failing to engage with the task.

  2. 2

    How might reduced activity in the corpus callosum contribute to violence?

    Model answer

    Poorer communication between the hemispheres would leave the left hemisphere less able to moderate the negative emotion generated in the right.

  3. 3

    State the main conclusion Raine et al. drew.

    Model answer

    Murderers pleading not guilty by reason of insanity show a distinctive pattern of brain dysfunction, particularly reduced prefrontal activity, that may predispose them to violence.

  4. 4

    State three things Raine et al. said their findings do not show.

    Model answer

    They do not show that violence is caused by biology alone, that these murderers were not responsible for their actions, or that the results apply to all violent offenders.

  5. 5

    Give one methodological strength of Raine et al.'s study.

    Model answer

    The controls were closely matched for age and sex and the scanning procedure was standardised, producing objective quantitative data on brain activity.

  6. 6

    Give one methodological weakness of the sample.

    Model answer

    All the offenders had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and most had brain injury or a mental disorder, so they cannot be taken as typical of violent offenders in general.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Psychology, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.