OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Attention: what Simons and Chabris add to Moray
- 2 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on how far Simons and Chabris change understanding of attention, whether they support Moray, relevance to everyday life, individual and cultural diversity, how both illustrate the cognitive area, a shared weakness and a joint practical message.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
To what extent do Moray's and Simons and Chabris's studies improve our understanding of individual diversity?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
To what extent does Simons and Chabris change our understanding of the key theme of attention?
Model answer
Substantially, because it extends selection from hearing to vision and from brief stimuli to sustained dynamic events, and shows that attentional load and resemblance to the attended set determine what reaches awareness.
- 2
Does the contemporary study support or contradict Moray?
Model answer
Largely support, since both agree that unattended information is mostly lost, but it adds that breaking through depends on how far something resembles the attended items rather than only on personal significance.
- 3
Which study has the greater relevance to everyday life, and why?
Model answer
Simons and Chabris, because failing to see a person in a moving scene maps directly onto driving and crowd safety, whereas shadowing prose through headphones has no everyday counterpart.
- 4
To what extent do Moray's and Simons and Chabris's studies improve our understanding of individual diversity?
Model answer
Simons and Chabris contributes usefully by showing that under identical conditions 54% noticed and 46% did not, pointing to genuine individual differences in attention that Moray's tiny samples could not reveal.
- 5
To what extent do Moray's and Simons and Chabris's studies improve our understanding of cultural diversity?
Model answer
Hardly at all, since both sampled Western university populations, so neither shows whether selective attention or inattentional blindness differ across cultures.
- 6
Explain how both studies illustrate the cognitive area of psychology.
Model answer
Both infer the workings of an unobservable internal process from performance on a controlled task, treating the mind as a processing system with limited capacity.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Cognitive Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.