OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Lee et al. (1997) evaluations of lying and truth-telling: evaluation
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on the evaluation of Lee et al.'s study, including what it suggests about universal stage theories, sample strengths, standardisation, validity, language problems, generalisability, protection of children, and applications for teachers.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why can the validity of the findings be questioned?
Give one limit on the generalisability of the findings.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does the study suggest about universal stage accounts of moral development?
Model answer
They are only part of the picture, since a universal cognitive sequence cannot explain why children of the same age in different countries judge the same modest lie in opposite ways.
- 2
Give one strength of the sample.
Model answer
Two hundred and twenty-eight children across two countries and three ages gave reasonable numbers in every group and allowed age and culture to be compared systematically.
- 3
Give one strength relating to standardisation.
Model answer
Identical stories, illustrations, rating chart and interview procedure were used in both countries, making the comparison fair and the study straightforward to replicate.
- 4
Why can the validity of the findings be questioned?
Model answer
Judging a character in a short story is not the same as deciding whether to lie oneself, so the study measures stated evaluations rather than moral behaviour.
- 5
What problem arises from running the study in two languages?
Model answer
The stories and the labels on the rating chart had to work in two languages, and a word such as lie may not carry exactly the same weight in each, which could affect the comparison.
- 6
Give one limit on the generalisability of the findings.
Model answer
Only two countries were sampled, both using urban schoolchildren, so the results cannot be taken to describe collectivist and individualist cultures in general.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Developmental Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.