OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Core Studies: Social Area
Responses to people in need: what Levine et al. add to Piliavin et al.
- 3 things to know
- Component 02
Overview
Recall questions on how far Levine et al. change understanding of responses to people in need, cost-reward as cultural, correcting bias in bystander research, what Piliavin still explains, diversity, and findings on the sex of helpers.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why can Levine's findings not simply replace Piliavin's conclusions about emergencies?
In what way does Levine suggest the cost–reward calculation itself may be cultural?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How does Levine's study extend our understanding of responses to people in need?
Model answer
It shows that helping depends not only on the immediate situation and the victim's characteristics but also on the culture and economy of the place where the encounter happens.
- 2
In what way does Levine suggest the cost–reward calculation itself may be cultural?
Model answer
What counts as a cost of walking past depends on local norms of social obligation, so a culture that values social harmony raises the psychological cost of failing to help.
- 3
How does Levine correct a bias in the earlier bystander research?
Model answer
It moves the study of helping out of the United States and into 23 countries, addressing the ethnocentrism of drawing universal conclusions from American samples.
- 4
Give one way in which Piliavin still explains something Levine cannot.
Model answer
Piliavin shows how helping varies with the victim's apparent condition and race within a single population, a source of variation Levine's design never tested.
- 5
Why can Levine's findings not simply replace Piliavin's conclusions about emergencies?
Model answer
Levine's situations were low-cost and non-urgent, so the cultural differences he found may not appear when helping is dangerous or distressing.
- 6
How far does this pair advance our understanding of cultural diversity?
Model answer
It moves from a single American city to 23 countries and shows helping varies widely between them, though only one large city per country was sampled so within-country diversity is missed.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies: Social Area, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.