levo

Environmental Psychology

Wells (2000) office personalisation: background, method and gender differences

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 03

Overview

Recall questions on the aim and method of Wells's 2000 study of office personalisation, the employees sampled, the survey response rate, photographs of workspaces, how common personalisation was, and gender differences in its amount and type.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Why were photographs of workspaces taken?

Who and when

What method did Wells use?

Key term

Who took part in Wells's study?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What was the aim of Wells's (2000) study?

    Model answer

    To investigate gender differences in workplace personalisation and how personalisation and company policy on it relate to employee and organisational wellbeing.

  2. 2

    What method did Wells use?

    Model answer

    A correlational study using questionnaire surveys of employees and managers, supported by site visits at which workspaces were photographed.

  3. 3

    Who took part in Wells's study?

    Model answer

    338 employees and 20 managers from 20 businesses in Orange County, California, most of them white-collar office workers.

  4. 4

    What was the response rate to the employee survey, and why is it a concern?

    Model answer

    About 23% of those approached responded, so the sample may over-represent people who feel strongly about their workspace.

  5. 5

    Why were photographs of workspaces taken?

    Model answer

    To provide objective evidence of what was actually on display rather than relying only on employees' own descriptions.

  6. 6

    How common was personalisation among the employees?

    Model answer

    Most employees personalised their workspace to some extent, showing that it is a normal rather than an unusual behaviour.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Environmental Psychology, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.