levo

Core Studies: Individual Differences Area

Hancock et al. (2011) language of psychopaths: background and procedure

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on psychopathy and how it was measured, the aim, method, design and sample of Hancock et al.'s 2011 study, exclusions, the interview task, preparing transcripts, the Wmatrix and Dictionary of Affect in Language tools.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Process

How were the interviews prepared for analysis?

Study

Who made up the sample?

Key term

What cut-off separated the two groups?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Define psychopathy.

    Model answer

    It is a personality disorder marked by a lack of empathy and remorse, shallow emotion, manipulativeness and an egocentric, predatory attitude towards other people.

  2. 2

    How was psychopathy measured in this study?

    Model answer

    With the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, a standardised clinical rating scale scored by trained assessors from an interview and from file information.

  3. 3

    What cut-off separated the two groups?

    Model answer

    A score of 25 or above on the checklist classified a man as a psychopath.

  4. 4

    State the aim of Hancock et al.'s study.

    Model answer

    To find out whether psychopathic murderers describe their crime in measurably different language from non-psychopathic murderers, in ways that reflect their instrumental motives and shallow emotion.

  5. 5

    Why should language reveal something about psychopathy?

    Model answer

    Because many word choices are made automatically and reflect the underlying thinking and emotional processing that a speaker cannot easily disguise.

  6. 6

    Which method and design did Hancock et al. use?

    Model answer

    It was a quasi-experiment with an independent measures design, using content analysis of interview transcripts to turn narrative into quantitative data.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Individual Differences Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.