OCR A-Level Psychology H567
Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication
Practical Activities and the Nature of Science
Mathematical Requirements for Research Methods
Studying and Evaluating the Core Studies: The Common Framework
Core Studies: Social Area
Core Studies: Cognitive Area
Core Studies: Developmental Area
Core Studies: Biological Area
Core Studies: Individual Differences Area
Areas and Perspectives in Psychology
Debates in Psychology
Practical Applications of Psychology
Issues in Mental Health
Child PsychologyApplied option
Criminal PsychologyApplied option
Environmental PsychologyApplied option
Sport and Exercise PsychologyApplied option
Methodological Issues and Debates Running Through Applied Psychology
Sport and Exercise Psychology
Fazey and Hardy (1988) catastrophe model: criticisms of the inverted-U and the cusp model
- 1 thing to know
- Component 03
Overview
Recall questions on the purpose and method of Fazey and Hardy's 1988 paper, the origin of the inverted-U hypothesis, their criticisms of it, arousal as more than one construct, the catastrophe model's mathematical basis, and the cusp model when cognitive anxiety is low.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What was the purpose of Fazey and Hardy's work?
Model answer
They set out to expose the weaknesses of the inverted-U hypothesis as an account of the stress and performance relationship and to offer catastrophe models as a better alternative.
- 2
What research method did Fazey and Hardy use?
Model answer
They produced a monograph, a specialist written review of one subject, in which they analysed existing theory and evidence and then proposed a mathematical model rather than collecting data from participants.
- 3
Where did the inverted-U hypothesis originally come from, and who applied it to sport?
Model answer
It grew out of Yerkes and Dodson's 1908 work on habit formation in mice under punishment, and Oxendine extended it in 1970 to the relationship between arousal and motor performance.
- 4
What three major criticisms did Fazey and Hardy make of the inverted-U hypothesis?
Model answer
They argued that it ignores the multidimensional nature of arousal and anxiety, that sound experimental support for its detailed predictions is lacking, and that it has little predictive validity in real performance settings.
- 5
Why did Fazey and Hardy object to treating arousal as a single unified construct?
Model answer
They argued that physiological arousal must be separated from activation, and that cognitive anxiety and somatic anxiety behave differently, so a one-dimensional measure cannot capture what happens to a stressed performer.
- 6
What had Fazey and Hardy observed in athletes that the inverted-U could not explain?
Model answer
They had seen that when an athlete went past the optimum the drop in performance was sudden and dramatic rather than gradual, and that small reductions in stress afterwards did nothing to restore performance.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Sport and Exercise Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.