levo

Core Studies: Developmental Area

Lee et al. (1997) evaluations of lying and truth-telling: background, method and materials

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 02

Overview

Recall questions on the aim and theoretical question of Lee et al.'s 1997 study of Chinese and Canadian children's evaluations of lying and truth-telling, its method, design, sample and ages, the prosocial and antisocial stories, and the rating scale.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Study

Why did Lee et al. choose Chinese and Canadian children for comparison?

Key term

Describe the materials used.

Key term

Give an example of a prosocial story.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What was the aim of Lee et al.'s study?

    Model answer

    To compare how Chinese and Canadian children judge lying and truth-telling in situations involving good deeds and bad deeds, and to see whether those judgements change with age.

  2. 2

    What theoretical question does the study address?

    Model answer

    Whether moral development is a universal cognitive process, as stage theories claim, or is shaped by the values into which a child is socialised.

  3. 3

    State the method and design used by Lee et al.

    Model answer

    It was a cross-cultural quasi-experiment, comparing pre-existing groups defined by culture and age, while every child judged all four types of story.

  4. 4

    Who took part in Lee et al.'s study?

    Model answer

    One hundred and twenty children in Hangzhou in China and one hundred and eight in Fredericton in Canada, two hundred and twenty-eight in all, with roughly equal numbers of boys and girls.

  5. 5

    Which ages were tested, and why were several ages used?

    Model answer

    Children of seven, nine and eleven took part, so that any widening of the difference between the two cultures with age could be detected.

  6. 6

    Describe the materials used.

    Model answer

    Four short illustrated stories, half describing a good deed and half a bad deed, each with a version in which the character owns up and a version in which the character denies what they did.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Research Methods and Techniques
Planning and Conducting Research
Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
Report Writing and Scientific Communication

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The tests are a old.
centurydecadeyear

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

APunishment requires deprivation, loss of autonomy and stigma.
BReform requires trust, responsibility and self-respect.
CThe regime that achieves one tends to undermine the other.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Range means the highest score minus the lowest score.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Core Studies: Developmental Area, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.