Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Contract: Essential Requirements and Formation
Privity of contract and third party rights
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Basic rule of privity of contract and two other established exceptions to privity.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case is the leading authority on privity?
How does privity relate to the rule that consideration must move from the promisee?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the basic rule of privity of contract.
Model answer
Privity means that only a party to a contract can sue or be sued on it. A stranger to the agreement acquires no rights under it at common law.
- 2
Which case is the leading authority on privity?
Model answer
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co v Selfridge [1915] held that Dunlop could not enforce a resale price term. Dunlop was not a party to the contract between the dealer and Selfridge.
- 3
How does privity relate to the rule that consideration must move from the promisee?
Model answer
Tweddle v Atkinson (1861) failed both because the groom was not a party and because he gave nothing. The two rules often defeat the same claim for different reasons.
- 4
How did the widow succeed in Beswick v Beswick [1968]?
Model answer
Beswick v Beswick [1968] concerned a promise to pay an annuity to the seller's widow. The widow succeeded as administratrix of her husband's estate and obtained specific performance.
- 5
What did Jackson v Horizon Holidays [1975] allow?
Model answer
Jackson v Horizon Holidays [1975] allowed a father to recover damages covering his family's disappointment on a ruined holiday. The contract had been made for the benefit of the whole family.
- 6
How did the House of Lords react to Jackson v Horizon Holidays?
Model answer
Woodar Investment Development v Wimpey Construction [1980] doubted any general right to recover a third party's loss. The House of Lords treated the holiday case as a special situation.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Essential Requirements and Formation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.