levo

Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability

Factual causation

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Test for factual causation, de minimis principle in causation and novus actus interveniens.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What must the prosecution prove about causation in a result crime?

Key term

State the test for factual causation.

Numbers

Which case illustrates the but for test?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What must the prosecution prove about causation in a result crime?

    Model answer

    The prosecution must prove both factual causation and legal causation. Failure on either limb defeats the charge.

  2. 2

    State the test for factual causation.

    Model answer

    Factual causation applies the but for test. The question is whether the result would have occurred but for the defendant's conduct.

  3. 3

    Which case illustrates the but for test?

    Model answer

    R v White [1910] acquitted a son of murder after he put cyanide in his mother's drink. The mother died of a heart attack before drinking it, so the poisoning was not a factual cause.

  4. 4

    What was the defendant in R v White [1910] convicted of instead?

    Model answer

    R v White [1910] resulted in a conviction for attempted murder. The intention and the more than merely preparatory act were both present.

  5. 5

    Is the defendant's act required to be the sole cause of the result?

    Model answer

    The defendant's act need not be the only cause of the prohibited result. Several causes may operate together without breaking the chain.

  6. 6

    How much must the defendant's contribution be for legal causation?

    Model answer

    The contribution must be more than minimal or trifling. R v Kimsey [1996] approved a direction that the contribution must be more than a slight or trifling link.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.