Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Reform
The case for a UK Bill of Rights
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
UK Bill of Rights, ownership argument for a Bill of Rights and argument about adding rights the Convention omits.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the ownership argument for a Bill of Rights?
What is the argument about adding rights the Convention omits?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is meant by a UK Bill of Rights?
Model answer
A UK Bill of Rights is a proposed domestic statute setting out rights in terms chosen by Parliament. The proposal is usually framed as a replacement for the Human Rights Act rather than an addition to it.
- 2
What is the ownership argument for a Bill of Rights?
Model answer
Supporters argue that rights drafted domestically would command greater public legitimacy than a text negotiated in 1950. A domestic instrument is said to belong to the country rather than being imposed from outside.
- 3
What is the argument about adding rights the Convention omits?
Model answer
Supporters argue a domestic Bill could protect rights the Convention does not, such as trial by jury, a right to social security, or environmental protections. The Convention sets a floor, not a ceiling.
- 4
What is the argument about clarifying the role of Strasbourg?
Model answer
Supporters argue a Bill could state expressly that the Supreme Court is the final authority on rights in the United Kingdom. Domestic courts would then develop rights rather than mirror Strasbourg.
- 5
What is the argument about restraining the interpretive duty?
Model answer
Supporters argue that section 3 gives courts too much latitude to rewrite statutes. A Bill could narrow the duty so that a court interprets rather than legislates.
- 6
What is the argument about responsibilities?
Model answer
Some proposals would set out responsibilities alongside rights, or allow a person's conduct to be weighed when a qualified right is claimed. Supporters present this as restoring a balance the public expects.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Reform, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.