Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences
Duress by threats and the Graham test
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Defence of duress by threats, first limb of the Graham test and second limb of the Graham test.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Is duress a justification or an excuse?
Which case sets out the test for duress?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the defence of duress by threats?
Model answer
Duress by threats applies where the defendant commits an offence because of a threat of death or serious injury. The defendant's will is overborne by the threat.
- 2
Is duress a justification or an excuse?
Model answer
Duress operates as an excuse rather than a justification. The law accepts that the defendant should not be blamed although the act itself remains wrong.
- 3
Which case sets out the test for duress?
Model answer
R v Graham [1982] set out the two-part test for duress. The House of Lords approved the test in R v Howe [1987].
- 4
State the first limb of the Graham test.
Model answer
The defendant must have been compelled to act because of a reasonable belief that death or serious injury would follow. The threat must have caused the defendant to act as charged.
- 5
State the second limb of the Graham test.
Model answer
A sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the defendant's characteristics must have responded in the same way. The second limb is objective.
- 6
Which characteristics may be attributed to the reasonable person?
Model answer
R v Bowen [1996] allowed age, sex, pregnancy, serious physical disability and a recognised psychiatric condition. Low intelligence and mere timidity were excluded.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.