levo

Human Rights: Enforcement

Judicial review: procedure, standing and remedies

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Permission stage, time limit for judicial review and test for standing.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is the pre-action protocol?

Key term

Name the three prerogative remedies.

Key term

What non-prerogative remedies are available?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Which court hears a claim for judicial review?

    Model answer

    A claim for judicial review is heard in the Administrative Court, part of the King's Bench Division of the High Court. Certain immigration and asylum matters go to the Upper Tribunal instead.

  2. 2

    What is the permission stage?

    Model answer

    A claimant must obtain permission from the court before the claim proceeds to a full hearing. The requirement filters out unarguable claims before a public body is put to the cost of defending them.

  3. 3

    What is the time limit for judicial review?

    Model answer

    A claim must be filed promptly and in any event within three months of the grounds arising. Shorter limits apply in planning and procurement, and promptness is a separate requirement from the outer limit.

  4. 4

    Why is the time limit so short?

    Model answer

    Public administration requires certainty, and third parties act in reliance on decisions. A long limitation period would leave public decisions open to challenge after they had been implemented.

  5. 5

    What is the test for standing?

    Model answer

    A claimant must have a sufficient interest in the matter to which the claim relates. The courts have interpreted sufficient interest generously, so pressure groups with genuine expertise have been permitted to bring claims.

  6. 6

    How does standing in judicial review differ from standing under the Human Rights Act?

    Model answer

    Judicial review uses the sufficient interest test, which a representative organisation can satisfy. The Human Rights Act uses the narrower victim test, which requires the claimant to be directly affected.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.