Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
The common duty of care owed to visitors
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The section 2(2) duty to keep the visitor reasonably safe for the purpose of the visit, not to make the premises safe — Laverton, Rochester Cathedral and the ordinary risks of everyday life.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Does the common duty of care require the premises themselves to be made safe?
What did Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme [2002] decide?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the common duty of care under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957.
Model answer
Section 2(2) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 sets out the common duty of care. The occupier must take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances. The visitor must be kept reasonably safe for the purposes of the visit.
- 2
Does the common duty of care require the premises themselves to be made safe?
Model answer
The duty is to keep the visitor reasonably safe, not to make the premises safe. An occupier who takes reasonable care is not liable for every hazard on the land.
- 3
What did Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme [2002] decide?
Model answer
A customer slipped on a wet floor in a takeaway on a rainy night. The Court of Appeal held the occupier had taken reasonable care by laying slip-resistant tiles and mopping regularly.
- 4
What did Rochester Cathedral v Debell [2016] decide?
Model answer
A visitor tripped on a small lump of concrete at the base of a bollard. The Court of Appeal held there was no breach, because premises need not be free of every minor hazard.
- 5
Must an occupier guard against the ordinary risks of everyday life?
Model answer
The law does not require an occupier to remove every trivial risk found in ordinary life. A visitor is expected to take reasonable care for their own safety.
- 6
What must a visitor prove to succeed under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957?
Model answer
The visitor must prove that the injury was caused by the state of the premises. The visitor must then prove that the occupier failed to take reasonable care.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.